Skip to main content

The opinionated respond on "making money while breathing fire"

Our bartending industry seems to be divided: there are the "craft bartenders" with suspenders and impressive mustaches (nowadays also with tattoos of bartending tools) and "dive bartenders" which are all about speed (and have probably a more rustic look - but still have tattoos of bartending tools).

Frederic of had this post which cemented these two philosophies:
My middle talk on Friday at Tales of the Cocktail had one of the more curious titles, namely "Make Money while Breathing Fire." The name was not about breathing actual fire but how bar teams can differentiate into the greeter and the speed person/drink maker. The panelists were JJ Goodman (owner of London Cocktail Club), John Lermayer (Miami's Sweet Liberty), and Zach Patterson (West Holywood's Melrose Umbrella Company) with moderator Adrian Biggs (Bacardi ambassador). 

The premise of the talk was that with the cocktail renaissance, there was a lot of pressure in making ice, appearances, glassware, ingredients, and cocktails perfect, but at what cost? 
People of the "speed faction" always paint the picture of the craft bartender, who cannot serve his guests, because cocktails take too long; and who is educating everyone and showcase themselves to be something better than their guests.

To be honest, I have been to quite a lot of craft bars (but not in the US) - but never encountered this stereotype. Sure a cocktail can take longer, if the business is crazy. Sure, some bartenders educate or edutain along the way. But this purely negative stereotype IMHO isn't realistic.

And further: the assumption, that guests would not return, if they get a great cocktail, but their experience (measured by the timeliness of service) isn't great, is just not true. 
I have worked in Vu's Bar: with Dresscode and great cocktails (at the time) - and due to a crazy business level, our cocktails took at times very very long. But basically all guests returned and we had a sky-high customer satisfaction rating. 
Assume makes an ASS out of U and ME?
There is also another point, which the Tales of the Cocktail discussion simply dismisses: Market Segmentation! Yes - maybe some bars are not customer-friendly, but to assume that most bars in the "craft segment" are like that, is just non-sense!
Back to market segmentation: there are guests, which like raucous bars, they prefer a busy place before they like good drinks. But this is one particular group. Other groups are gourmets - me for example go only to bars with good drinks - if they are busy ok - but I would even prefer a bar, in which I can talk to the bartender.

I also have the feeling, that in the discussion was a big emphasis on making the most money as possible. Instead of making some money with what you believe in. IMHO there is a market for bars, which are just offering what people could expect - where you go with your buddies, when you want to unwind (...). But there are also a market for bars, which are doing new things, opening new markets, pushing the limits (quality-wise, service-wise, presentation).

And further... most bars will do sufficient mis-en-place and find short-cuts to serve impressive ice shapes, garnishes etc. without jeopardizing the timeliness of service. And it is basically the job of the bar manager (and the bartenders) not only to create innovative cocktails but also be able to serve them...

The take away isn't, that craft bars are great and dives aren't. The take away is, that there are a lot of different people out there, which have different expectations. And that there are a lot of bars out there, which are different and have a specific target audience. Only because there are bartenders, who never left their 20's, doesn't mean, that there is no demand or no justification to open a refined bar.
And even though I am not a fan of "elite" venue, even if a bar can find these type of customers, it is ok. 50 $ cocktails which take 30 minutes to make (or which you have got to preorder)? Why not!


Popular posts from this blog

How to use citric acid - and why you might not want to use it anyway!

To be honest, I shied away of this topic, because I think, people can misinterpret this - big time. I don't want to be part of the problem - I want to be part of the solution!  But when Chris, over at A Bar Above  discussed this subject- I literally could not resist to join into "the discussion". Here is the video: I - however take a bit slower approach than Chris. What is citric acid? Chemical Compound Citric acid is a weak organic acid with the formula C6H8O7. It is a natural preservative/conservative and is also used to add an acidic or sour taste to foods and drinks. Wikipedia Formula: C6H8O7 Molar Mass: 192.124 g/mol Melting Point: 153C Density: 1.66 g/cm3 Boiling point: 175C Soluble in: Water Why is it controversial? In my "mixology world" it is controversial, as citric acid is the stuff, which makes the nightmarish sour mix [ preferably in powder form ] sour. Yeah - citric acid is the main ingredient in one of the most

Fentiman's - part deux

You might already know [otherwise just read my last post ], that Fentiman's Botanical Tonic Water taste great. And I mentioned, that I am not totally convinced of the other flavours... Let me now and here explain why. First to the great ones: Rose Lemonade is really nice... however I have to come across one rose drink, which doesn't taste really good. A couple of years I have reviewed [and tried] Sence - also a drink which is based on Bulgarian roses - and it was lovely. Fentiman's Rose Lemonade is not different - maybe slightly too acidic. Anyway - it is just great [however also very simple to replicate - citric acid, sugar syrup, carbonated water and rose water is all what you need...]. The Curiousity Cola is also nice - it is a bit more standalone and unique as other cola sodas- but hit the right spots. Only problem still is: the original just taste better and - well like the original. Cherrybark Cola - is another good soda. While I've expected it to taste

What is the best cranberry juice in the bar?

A good friend of me "whatsapp'ed" me today and asked for my expertise: "What is the best cranberry juice?" I would loved to just let him know the brand - however it is not that easy. What do we understand of cranberry juice? One of the biggest [maybe the  biggest producer] of cranberry products is Ocean Spray. And: it is well regarded. Problem is: it is not a juice! Wait - what? Ocean Spray doesn't produce a juice - they produce a juice cocktail - which translates into a lot of water, a lot of sugar, some taste-balancers as citric acid [nothing against this really] and a minuscule portion of juice - usually around 3%. Yes they have something which is called 100% juice. Which is on one hand true, on the other the biggest deception ever. Because you don't get 100% cranberry - you get a mixture of juices of concentrate - most of the time apple and white grape and a bit of cranberry. There are also some other brands around, which might feature a h