Skip to main content

White noise of aromas

Did you know, that Campari Bitter mainly taste like Grand Wormwood (Artimisia Absinthium)?

While re-opening the Italian restaurant in my workplace, I intended to recreate Campari Bitter without alcohol - Fauxpari Bitter if you like. As I am not into artificial coloring, but as "bug-juice" is also not really available here, I used hibiscus to color the drink in a deep red. And then I infused all type of herbs and spices into water (used my immersion circulator to steep the mixture for 3 hours at 65C).

The spices I used:

  • Dried orange peel
  • Coriander
  • Thyme (dry)
  • Rosemary (dry)
  • Oregano (dry)
  • Black pepper
  • Szechuan pepper
  • Sage (fresh)
  • Cinnamon
  • Allspice
  • Juniper
  • Bay leaf
  • Toasted cassia bark
  • Caraway
  • Vanilla
  • Fenugreek
  • Celery seeds
  • Fennel seeds
  • Star anise
  • Anise seeds
  • Green cardamom
Well I made two batches - one, with less ingredients (and less hibiscus) and one with all ingredients and more.

When I did the first batch, I didn't used water for the infusion but tonic water. I thought that the bitterness will be sufficient. However at the end it wasn't really bitter.
But a friend brought me some wormwood (thanks Frederique)  and another friend some cinchona bark (that goes to you Darcy), and after I steeped it separate in water, things seemed to come together.
In fact, the mixture just started to taste like Campari, when I added the wormwood infusion. 

And: the first infusion was better than the second one (later about this).
This is not a post, to give you a recipe for Fauxpari. But I realized one thing: a lot of botanicals create something what I call white noise (for all into acoustics, please accept my apologies of simplifying a matter... is it white noise or grey noise??? whatever...).

There are botanicals which make a difference. It is not so much their strength of taste, but rather their uniqueness. Hibiscus for example, has a very sour taste, but also a unique taste map. Adding more hibiscus changed really the outcome. Another botanical which has probably the biggest influence was wormwood. If I am opening a bottle Campari, I know now, how much wormwood is responsible for the original character. As wormwood is really very bitter, the cinchona bark was simply not necessary. 
Then there are botanicals, which are still rounding up the character, but maybe are not as characterizing for the end result. My surprise was, that vanilla didn't really changed the character. It rounds out the character but isn't so important after all. Orange peel was surprisingly supple as well. Off course, you do have a strong orange character in Campari, but it probably comes from a combination of orange peel, coriander and maybe green cardamom?...

Other botanicals didn't made a big difference: rosemary, thyme etc. I had the feeling, that you don't really taste them. But you need the multitude of botanicals, as it creates (I guess I am the first person who is calling it like that) white noise of aromas.

Basically they cancelling themselves partly out, yet change the infusion towards a dense character. The point is, that you could take out one or two or more botanicals, and your infusion would still be "successful". So you need the diversity of botanicals, but you don't necessary need the specific ones.

More testing has to be done for sure - but at this point, I am quite surprised about the whole concept.
Other aromas can even interfere... I added in the second batch cinnamon (which I forgot in the first batch) - turns out, that cinnamon isn't necessary the best spice for Fauxpari.

And this concept doesn't necessarily be only applied to infusions (some herbal liqueurs, amaros, bitter aperitifs, vermouths etc.), but can be also applied for spice mixtures.

Do you have any experience in using a lot of ingredient and how did your infusion (with or without alcohol) turned out?

I am exciting to explore this topic more!


Popular posts from this blog

How to use citric acid - and why you might not want to use it anyway!

To be honest, I shied away of this topic, because I think, people can misinterpret this - big time. I don't want to be part of the problem - I want to be part of the solution!  But when Chris, over at A Bar Above  discussed this subject- I literally could not resist to join into "the discussion". Here is the video: I - however take a bit slower approach than Chris. What is citric acid? Chemical Compound Citric acid is a weak organic acid with the formula C6H8O7. It is a natural preservative/conservative and is also used to add an acidic or sour taste to foods and drinks. Wikipedia Formula: C6H8O7 Molar Mass: 192.124 g/mol Melting Point: 153C Density: 1.66 g/cm3 Boiling point: 175C Soluble in: Water Why is it controversial? In my "mixology world" it is controversial, as citric acid is the stuff, which makes the nightmarish sour mix [ preferably in powder form ] sour. Yeah - citric acid is the main ingredient in one of the most

Agar-Agar Clarification

Not often, I am posting here things, which are clearly not my ideas... However Dave Arnold is clearly a mad scientist [no, he really is!] - and he posted amazing stuff on his website - no - don't click now - just follow the link later. One of the most impressive posts about mixology, besides of demystifying the mechanics of shaking, were clarification techniques. Look, after him, you could use a centrifuge [which would set you back a couple thousand bucks] and a chemical compound, which solidifies sediments. I am not a fan of that. Then there is gelatine clarification; this works quite well [I tried it several times my self] - you gelatinize a liquid [with little gelatine only], freeze it, thaw it [in the fridge] over a colander and a muslin cloth. Thats it. Unfortunately this has several problems: Gelatine is made out of animal bones - hence it is neither vegetarian nor vegan, which you won't usually expect of a beverage. You have to freez

King Robert II Vodka

Who would knew, that I am reviewing a budget vodka here - on the But this isn't a normal review. I skip the marketing perception and use this product to cut directly to the case: Vodka is a "rather" neutral, colorless, "rather" flavorless and odorless distilled beverage from any agricultural source - and depending on the country, it has a minimum of 37.5% and 40% abv. As I said time and time again before: at times it is absolutely nonsense to talk about premium and luxury, when the original product doesn't really "hold this promise". Luxury water can have luxurious marketing, luxurious packaging, can be even rare and slightly more expensive "to produce". However really it is just water. Maybe it has some nuances to normal water - however those nuances (in a blind-test) are pretty small. Vodka is extremely similar - and the chain of evidence (despite a lot of people trying to proof otherwise) makes it re