Skip to main content

Blue Bottle Gins

Yeah - I know - not the best or wittiest headliner.

Well - but here we are - talking about  those 3 gins, all of them coming in blue bottles: Bombay Sapphire, Star of Bombay and Citadelle.
However this won’t be a review - or an objective side by side comparison... just my impressions.

Bombay Sapphire:
I have got to admit, since Bombay Sapphire has been introduced, I actually liked it pretty much - and I can honestly say, that it has been one of my favorite gins. Probably you could even say, that Bombay Sapphire was the first gin, I’ve genuinely appreciated (and in those days, not a lot of people drank gin - nor where there a lot of options out there).
My appreciation took though a slight dip, when Bacardi took over the reigns and reduced “their” gin in most markets from 47% to 40% abv. In Dubai though, the 47% abv version is still used, which is fantastic. In this impression, I would say, that Bombay Sapphire is definitely in the top group of gins - it might be not as fancy, or nouveau than the new kids on the block, but in a blind tests of let’s say 20 or more gins, it would for sure get one of the top 5 spots. Great gin, great price... cheers!

Star of Bombay:
With all of those new kids gins on the block, Bacardi might have thought, that they had to up their game. They have had a very limited release of a different expression of a more premium Sapphire (I haven’t tried), and they have introduced their “Asian” brother of “basically the same mother” - Bombay Sapphire East (I don’t really like it... probably it is the low alcohol content). But since a couple of month, they released Star of Bombay - which should be a more premium expression of Bombay Sapphire.
When you check out reviews, you will find, that most people really like “Star of Bombay”. In its defense, the abv is even a tiny bit higher than the magic 47% at 47.5% abv. I think, that the bottle reminds a bit too much on the old Tanqueray ten bottle... but it is blue and it is pretty.
But here is the thing: it didn’t do a “better job” than the normal Bombay Sapphire 47% - even worse, I prefer the “classic”. The aromatic is very similar to the original, only that it gets a bit more “clinical” around the corner. Due to the fact, that it is far more expensive and that it isn’t really my taste, I cannot whole heartedly recommend it.

So I had to buy a new bottle or two of juniper liquor (because my girlfriend is “nibbles”... and I had already the bottle of classic Bombay Sapphire, when I seen the other blue bottle: Citadelle.
I know, that this gin has far more botanicals than Bombay Sapphire - and this is neither good nor bad... but I thought that it cannot really hurt.
I have to say, that I had now several gins, which just didn’t brought it for me: Star of Bombay was the last one, Beefeater 24 wasn’t also that much impressive, Portobello Road nice, but not that memorable... I might just suffer of a gin exhaustion... hence I didn’t expected a lot, when I tried Citadelle. But hell - even though it is around for quite a while, and isn’t really part of the New (Gin) Power Generation it really delivers. It isn’t so unique... just a fresh, characterful gin, which is easy to drink, but has still some alcoholic backbone - 44% to be precise. And those 44% are actually not too less, to make a mean G&T or Martini with this French gem.
What really surprised me is, that Citadelle is distilled by Pierre Ferrand, a Cognac house which incidentally also produce Saffron gin and G’vine.

I honestly think, that there are too many gins on the market now. It seems, that gin went the same route as vodka - well I give gin the benefit of a doubt, as every gin is different, yet it is very difficult to really keep the overview which gin is best for what. Reviews are also not very much helping, as there is a lot of perception, which also works against a transparent playing field. 
In the bar, I suggest to focus on few distinct gins, which not only are tasting good according the people who are selling them (make blind tests!), but also are different enough, to be a differentiating option for the different taste of guests as well as for different cocktails and drinks. Out of todays three gins I would recommend normal Bombay Sapphire and maybe a tad more Citadelle (points for value for money goes mostly to Bombay Sapphire - however Citadelle isn’t as expensive as some “premium” options... yet far more expensive as Sapphire). But to be honest, if you would have Bombay Sapphire, don’t bother to buy an additional bottle of Citadelle... just maybe think of picking up one, when the “Bombay” needs to be replaced. Diversity is always great!


Popular posts from this blog

How to use citric acid - and why you might not want to use it anyway!

To be honest, I shied away of this topic, because I think, people can misinterpret this - big time. I don't want to be part of the problem - I want to be part of the solution!  But when Chris, over at A Bar Above  discussed this subject- I literally could not resist to join into "the discussion". Here is the video: I - however take a bit slower approach than Chris. What is citric acid? Chemical Compound Citric acid is a weak organic acid with the formula C6H8O7. It is a natural preservative/conservative and is also used to add an acidic or sour taste to foods and drinks. Wikipedia Formula: C6H8O7 Molar Mass: 192.124 g/mol Melting Point: 153C Density: 1.66 g/cm3 Boiling point: 175C Soluble in: Water Why is it controversial? In my "mixology world" it is controversial, as citric acid is the stuff, which makes the nightmarish sour mix [ preferably in powder form ] sour. Yeah - citric acid is the main ingredient in one of the most

Agar-Agar Clarification

Not often, I am posting here things, which are clearly not my ideas... However Dave Arnold is clearly a mad scientist [no, he really is!] - and he posted amazing stuff on his website - no - don't click now - just follow the link later. One of the most impressive posts about mixology, besides of demystifying the mechanics of shaking, were clarification techniques. Look, after him, you could use a centrifuge [which would set you back a couple thousand bucks] and a chemical compound, which solidifies sediments. I am not a fan of that. Then there is gelatine clarification; this works quite well [I tried it several times my self] - you gelatinize a liquid [with little gelatine only], freeze it, thaw it [in the fridge] over a colander and a muslin cloth. Thats it. Unfortunately this has several problems: Gelatine is made out of animal bones - hence it is neither vegetarian nor vegan, which you won't usually expect of a beverage. You have to freez

King Robert II Vodka

Who would knew, that I am reviewing a budget vodka here - on the But this isn't a normal review. I skip the marketing perception and use this product to cut directly to the case: Vodka is a "rather" neutral, colorless, "rather" flavorless and odorless distilled beverage from any agricultural source - and depending on the country, it has a minimum of 37.5% and 40% abv. As I said time and time again before: at times it is absolutely nonsense to talk about premium and luxury, when the original product doesn't really "hold this promise". Luxury water can have luxurious marketing, luxurious packaging, can be even rare and slightly more expensive "to produce". However really it is just water. Maybe it has some nuances to normal water - however those nuances (in a blind-test) are pretty small. Vodka is extremely similar - and the chain of evidence (despite a lot of people trying to proof otherwise) makes it re