Skip to main content

The Raise of Botanical Spirits

This post is inspired by a post on Diffords Guide online. But even though, I have never really thought about calling a distillate "Botanical Spirit", I always thought, that there have to be a new category of spirits.

It all began with the Sub Rosa Saffron and Tarragon vodka - sometime in 2011. I directly felt, that there is something "off" of calling those distillates vodka. Yes - there is flavored vodka - and mostly they are pretty simple and straight forward. However they already differ greatly from your classical pure vodka. However the Sub Rosa products were an even farther departure.

Since then, there have been a lot of new products, which mostly go under the vodka moniker, but are more complex... there are also "quite old products" like the flavored Absolut vodkas. Some, like Citron or Mandrin can be easily called vodka - there is a reasonable delicate aroma of the respective aroma. Some others are so strongly aromatized, that vodka seems not to fit anymore. Issue here: it also would not 100% fit to call them Botanical Spirit, I have got the odd feeling, that Absolut adds quite a lot of (highly processed) aromas. Yet these products don't really fit in the vodka category neither.

Why am I excited about these new category "botanical spirits"? Because it let distillers and brands experiment more without being limited by perception of some customers and laws on the other side.
A gin has to include juniper and coriander - and juniper should be the leading aroma botanical. Hence until now, most brands had a rather similar character. Don't get me wrong - there are great gins and not so great gins - but the (blind-folded) differences between one good to another are often subtle.

Botanical spirit can change that. And the creation of a (regulated) category, could also lead to a tighter control of other spirits - especially gin and vodka.

However there are few issues, do still have: having an new unregulated category is also not that great:

  • A reasonable quality mixing spirit should have an alcohol content of 40% and higher. 
    • For example Ketel One Botanical Spirits have 30%. This is due to a "non-sensical" reference to the calorie count (which doesn't make sense, as ethanol isn't metabolized the same way as e.g. fat or carbs). It's just to "cheap out" and reduce massively the mixability. Especially the pretty high price point could easily justify a higher abv.
  • A botanical spirit should be hot infused (speak: botanicals needs to be distilled) and based on real botanicals.
    • It is pretty straight forward: adding concentrated aromas (artificial, nature-identical or highly processed natural) is (in my eyes) cheating! 
    • We might need an additional category for this cheats (aromatized spirits someone?) - but botanical spirits it shouldn't be.
  • The base should be neutral alcohol.
    • This is about meeting (and managing) expectations. Gin is based on neutral alcohol (London Dry gin is based on neutral grain alcohol) - while there are a lot of different botanical recipes, this is one point which binds all gins together. Botanical Spirits should have similar.
  • The maximum of sugar supposed to be not more than 2% or even 0%?!
    • Also straight forward: adding sugar as rounding is a common practice in the spirit business to smoothen distillates. However it shouldn't make the spirit "sweet" and completely change the character of the spirit.
  • No other ingredients should be added.
    • I am pretty annoyed with the food industry and their use of "food science" to make things cheaper and manipulate tastes. When we are creating a new category, we should ensure, that the spirit industry doesn't do the same bad practices (or doesn't continue with them). I think, we are at a point, where we as customers could demand, that brands having an ingredient label on their liquor (I swear, that a lot of brands using HFCS and other "goodies"). Let bartender add a bit of lemon (or other sour agent), instead of adding citric acid directly to the distillate... Give the people the choice and the knowledge.

So that's it. What do you think? Is that utopia or is it reasonable? Comment below.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to use citric acid - and why you might not want to use it anyway!

To be honest, I shied away of this topic, because I think, people can misinterpret this - big time.


I don't want to be part of the problem - I want to be part of the solution! But when Chris, over at A Bar Above discussed this subject- I literally could not resist to join into "the discussion".

Here is the video:





I - however take a bit slower approach than Chris.
What is citric acid?
Chemical Compound
Citric acid is a weak organic acid with the formula C6H8O7. It is a natural preservative/conservative and is also used to add an acidic or sour taste to foods and drinks.
Wikipedia Formula: C6H8O7
Molar Mass: 192.124 g/mol
Melting Point: 153C
Density: 1.66 g/cm3
Boiling point: 175C
Soluble in: Water
Why is it controversial?
In my "mixology world" it is controversial, as citric acid is the stuff, which makes the nightmarish sour mix [preferably in powder form] sour. Yeah - citric acid is the main ingredient in one of the most controversial [and in the modern craft bartending wor…

The Best Alcohol-free Drink - Ipanema

Usually I call them [out of laziness] mocktails - but really I never liked this denomination.
As "mocktails" are usually long drinks, it is even twice wrong, to connect them to a cocktail [which is technically a short drink with alcohol]. 
Apart of this, I am not a big believer in mocktails. Sodas can be fantastic [home made grapefruit soda is fantastic, or homemade ginger ale, ginger beer or any other odd ingredient sodas]. Juices - fine. Lemonades - yes, refreshing and good. And iced teas - can be absolutely amazing. Hence you don't need sickly sweet syrupy juice mixtures.
But yes - there are few good ones.
Most of them a mimicking drinks with alcohol. You can make a pretty good alcohol-free Planters Punch, Hurricane or Mojito, if you are using Caribbean Syrup. Or you can use a juniper syrup for some alcohol-free gin drinks.
A drink which I got to know long time ago, very early in my career, is a bit a different beast [well - you cannot call an alcohol-free drink a bea…

The misconception of Old Tom Gin

These days I have thought a lot about gin. There are a lot of gins coming on the market and some people are already calling it the “new vodka”.

While I do understand this notion, it is (out of my humble perspective) not at all comparable.
Yes - gin has been really exploited in marketing (like vodka) - but it is really like any mainstream trend. Vodka has been always a bit different: while a lot of gins have significant differences (especially due to their different botanicals) - quality vodkas lack the big differences and their subtle differences are subdued within the different moods people are in - or what they have eaten for breakfast or lunch, or if they had one drink before or simply with the mixers, the vodka is consumed with.
Anyway - one big topic I have contemplated about is Old Tom Gin. In my eyes, this style has been largely misrepresented and misunderstood.
The otherwise informative article in Imbibe shows exactly the issue - people get mislead by marketing of liquor comp…