Skip to main content

The Raise of Botanical Spirits

This post is inspired by a post on Diffords Guide online. But even though, I have never really thought about calling a distillate "Botanical Spirit", I always thought, that there have to be a new category of spirits.

It all began with the Sub Rosa Saffron and Tarragon vodka - sometime in 2011. I directly felt, that there is something "off" of calling those distillates vodka. Yes - there is flavored vodka - and mostly they are pretty simple and straight forward. However they already differ greatly from your classical pure vodka. However the Sub Rosa products were an even farther departure.

Since then, there have been a lot of new products, which mostly go under the vodka moniker, but are more complex... there are also "quite old products" like the flavored Absolut vodkas. Some, like Citron or Mandrin can be easily called vodka - there is a reasonable delicate aroma of the respective aroma. Some others are so strongly aromatized, that vodka seems not to fit anymore. Issue here: it also would not 100% fit to call them Botanical Spirit, I have got the odd feeling, that Absolut adds quite a lot of (highly processed) aromas. Yet these products don't really fit in the vodka category neither.

Why am I excited about these new category "botanical spirits"? Because it let distillers and brands experiment more without being limited by perception of some customers and laws on the other side.
A gin has to include juniper and coriander - and juniper should be the leading aroma botanical. Hence until now, most brands had a rather similar character. Don't get me wrong - there are great gins and not so great gins - but the (blind-folded) differences between one good to another are often subtle.

Botanical spirit can change that. And the creation of a (regulated) category, could also lead to a tighter control of other spirits - especially gin and vodka.

However there are few issues, do still have: having an new unregulated category is also not that great:

  • A reasonable quality mixing spirit should have an alcohol content of 40% and higher. 
    • For example Ketel One Botanical Spirits have 30%. This is due to a "non-sensical" reference to the calorie count (which doesn't make sense, as ethanol isn't metabolized the same way as e.g. fat or carbs). It's just to "cheap out" and reduce massively the mixability. Especially the pretty high price point could easily justify a higher abv.
  • A botanical spirit should be hot infused (speak: botanicals needs to be distilled) and based on real botanicals.
    • It is pretty straight forward: adding concentrated aromas (artificial, nature-identical or highly processed natural) is (in my eyes) cheating! 
    • We might need an additional category for this cheats (aromatized spirits someone?) - but botanical spirits it shouldn't be.
  • The base should be neutral alcohol.
    • This is about meeting (and managing) expectations. Gin is based on neutral alcohol (London Dry gin is based on neutral grain alcohol) - while there are a lot of different botanical recipes, this is one point which binds all gins together. Botanical Spirits should have similar.
  • The maximum of sugar supposed to be not more than 2% or even 0%?!
    • Also straight forward: adding sugar as rounding is a common practice in the spirit business to smoothen distillates. However it shouldn't make the spirit "sweet" and completely change the character of the spirit.
  • No other ingredients should be added.
    • I am pretty annoyed with the food industry and their use of "food science" to make things cheaper and manipulate tastes. When we are creating a new category, we should ensure, that the spirit industry doesn't do the same bad practices (or doesn't continue with them). I think, we are at a point, where we as customers could demand, that brands having an ingredient label on their liquor (I swear, that a lot of brands using HFCS and other "goodies"). Let bartender add a bit of lemon (or other sour agent), instead of adding citric acid directly to the distillate... Give the people the choice and the knowledge.

So that's it. What do you think? Is that utopia or is it reasonable? Comment below.


Popular posts from this blog

How to use citric acid - and why you might not want to use it anyway!

To be honest, I shied away of this topic, because I think, people can misinterpret this - big time. I don't want to be part of the problem - I want to be part of the solution!  But when Chris, over at A Bar Above  discussed this subject- I literally could not resist to join into "the discussion". Here is the video: I - however take a bit slower approach than Chris. What is citric acid? Chemical Compound Citric acid is a weak organic acid with the formula C6H8O7. It is a natural preservative/conservative and is also used to add an acidic or sour taste to foods and drinks. Wikipedia Formula: C6H8O7 Molar Mass: 192.124 g/mol Melting Point: 153C Density: 1.66 g/cm3 Boiling point: 175C Soluble in: Water Why is it controversial? In my "mixology world" it is controversial, as citric acid is the stuff, which makes the nightmarish sour mix [ preferably in powder form ] sour. Yeah - citric acid is the main ingredient in one of the most

Agar-Agar Clarification

Not often, I am posting here things, which are clearly not my ideas... However Dave Arnold is clearly a mad scientist [no, he really is!] - and he posted amazing stuff on his website - no - don't click now - just follow the link later. One of the most impressive posts about mixology, besides of demystifying the mechanics of shaking, were clarification techniques. Look, after him, you could use a centrifuge [which would set you back a couple thousand bucks] and a chemical compound, which solidifies sediments. I am not a fan of that. Then there is gelatine clarification; this works quite well [I tried it several times my self] - you gelatinize a liquid [with little gelatine only], freeze it, thaw it [in the fridge] over a colander and a muslin cloth. Thats it. Unfortunately this has several problems: Gelatine is made out of animal bones - hence it is neither vegetarian nor vegan, which you won't usually expect of a beverage. You have to freez

King Robert II Vodka

Who would knew, that I am reviewing a budget vodka here - on the But this isn't a normal review. I skip the marketing perception and use this product to cut directly to the case: Vodka is a "rather" neutral, colorless, "rather" flavorless and odorless distilled beverage from any agricultural source - and depending on the country, it has a minimum of 37.5% and 40% abv. As I said time and time again before: at times it is absolutely nonsense to talk about premium and luxury, when the original product doesn't really "hold this promise". Luxury water can have luxurious marketing, luxurious packaging, can be even rare and slightly more expensive "to produce". However really it is just water. Maybe it has some nuances to normal water - however those nuances (in a blind-test) are pretty small. Vodka is extremely similar - and the chain of evidence (despite a lot of people trying to proof otherwise) makes it re