Skip to main content

Is the Bar Revolution over?

There is an interesting article on Thrillist...: Is the Bar Revolution over?

So what is my take on it?

First of all the obvious - yes the Cocktail Revolution is over! Because there is no more resistance on Bartender-side / operator-side etc. when it comes to the use of quality (and premium) ingredients. Because there is no more resistance of guests to pay for a drink $20.00 (due to alcohol prices here in the UAE - drinks are even more expensive in Dubai). Because there are no more big arguments, if you should use fresh lemons, limes or other juices... This all are an indication: the revolution is over.

The article though brings up another point: it is the commercialization of mixology. In this case I don't really understand the American way of thinking. Even though the prices are creeping up, a lot of Americans (especially bartenders) shy away of increasing prices. Is a cocktail worth $50.00? While this sounds outrageous, we surely have to look at other culinary arts (or consumer products) and can confirm: yes - there are almost no upper limits: the average ramen in the USA is probably far more expensive than the premium ramen in Tokyo. And yeah there are some fancy bakeries which take a dollar or two for their oven-wonders - let's not even talk about the wonders of wagyu or even Kobe steak (often in tiny portions) or $45K melons in Japan...

Why should a cocktail be limited to $20.00?

This is certainly one way to control "the flow". If a bar is targeted upscale, there are less people, who like to indulge into a rather expensive drink.

There are many other options as well (depending on the type of bar). A membership comes to my mind - not necessarily expensive and stuffy memberships like gentlemen clubs in England - but more modern and more whimsical ones. Reservations is another point.

No - you might not be able to maximize profits with this type of control - however you will be able to ensure quality consistency as well as sustainability of business many years to come.

I guess - the issue is, that the US sees bars as democratic right - as public houses (which they were in a certain time). But let's face it - a lot have changed, so the bar should change as well.

Back to the nay-saying in the article: The article emphasizes on the issue, that so many cocktail programs are needed, that a lot of people, which don't have the necessary skills are hired. This might be true. However I don't believe, that this is something particularly new. There was always great quality inconsistency throughout bars. There were even videos, where old (very old) bartender did classic drinks - and I found it cringeworthy to watch - because it was so out of fashioned - the drink hasn't been stirred/shaken enough, it has been poured in a warm glass and so on.

I don't think, that the overall picture has changed - only the knowledge and expectations of the average consumer has changed.

Let's sigh here for a moment: the Cocktail Revolution is over - but the quality bar is here to stay!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to use citric acid - and why you might not want to use it anyway!

To be honest, I shied away of this topic, because I think, people can misinterpret this - big time.


I don't want to be part of the problem - I want to be part of the solution! But when Chris, over at A Bar Above discussed this subject- I literally could not resist to join into "the discussion".

Here is the video:





I - however take a bit slower approach than Chris.
What is citric acid?
Chemical Compound
Citric acid is a weak organic acid with the formula C6H8O7. It is a natural preservative/conservative and is also used to add an acidic or sour taste to foods and drinks.
Wikipedia Formula: C6H8O7
Molar Mass: 192.124 g/mol
Melting Point: 153C
Density: 1.66 g/cm3
Boiling point: 175C
Soluble in: Water
Why is it controversial?
In my "mixology world" it is controversial, as citric acid is the stuff, which makes the nightmarish sour mix [preferably in powder form] sour. Yeah - citric acid is the main ingredient in one of the most controversial [and in the modern craft bartending wor…

The Best Alcohol-free Drink - Ipanema

Usually I call them [out of laziness] mocktails - but really I never liked this denomination.
As "mocktails" are usually long drinks, it is even twice wrong, to connect them to a cocktail [which is technically a short drink with alcohol]. 
Apart of this, I am not a big believer in mocktails. Sodas can be fantastic [home made grapefruit soda is fantastic, or homemade ginger ale, ginger beer or any other odd ingredient sodas]. Juices - fine. Lemonades - yes, refreshing and good. And iced teas - can be absolutely amazing. Hence you don't need sickly sweet syrupy juice mixtures.
But yes - there are few good ones.
Most of them a mimicking drinks with alcohol. You can make a pretty good alcohol-free Planters Punch, Hurricane or Mojito, if you are using Caribbean Syrup. Or you can use a juniper syrup for some alcohol-free gin drinks.
A drink which I got to know long time ago, very early in my career, is a bit a different beast [well - you cannot call an alcohol-free drink a bea…

King Robert II Vodka

Who would knew, that I am reviewing a budget vodka here - on the opinionatedalchemist.com. But this isn't a normal review. I skip the marketing perception and use this product to cut directly to the case:


Vodka is a "rather" neutral, colorless, "rather" flavorless and odorless distilled beverage from any agricultural source - and depending on the country, it has a minimum of 37.5% and 40% abv.

As I said time and time again before: at times it is absolutely nonsense to talk about premium and luxury, when the original product doesn't really "hold this promise". Luxury water can have luxurious marketing, luxurious packaging, can be even rare and slightly more expensive "to produce". However really it is just water. Maybe it has some nuances to normal water - however those nuances (in a blind-test) are pretty small. Vodka is extremely similar - and the chain of evidence (despite a lot of people trying to proof otherwise) makes it really clear…