Skip to main content

Glenmorangie- unused potential

Scotch can be very divers. It can be smokey and decisive, it can be floral and almost fruity - it can be delicate and really heavy and oily.

Long time ago, I have been on a whisky-convention and in a workshop, they guys at Glenmorangie gave us Glenmorangie "spirit" to try - totally unaged Glenmorangie. I expected to be harsh and undrinkable - but it was beautiful - extremely fruity (think Poire William) - if they would have sold it, I would have purchased it. In the same event, they have introduced the experimental release of Glenmorangie Artisan Cask (I purchased later the bottle). For a very young whisky it hasn't been cheap, but it was truly incredible. A testament, that Single Malt Whisky doesn't need a lot of cask influences (at least some delicate distillates like Glenmorangie).

Glenmorangie has shown for sure a lot of innovation. They also populated barrel-finishing - which is used now from most of the industry, to introduce interesting variants.

As LVMH purchased the brand, they received a lot of backing - and the bottles look amazing. But I also recognize, that there are far fewer unique things coming to the public. On one hand some brands (Duty Free) like Le Clos sells some uniquely finished Glenmorangie. And very few vintages. But the portfolio is mostly clean - almost surgical clean. There is some romance missing.

And the most obvious issue is the from my side "newly discovered" Glenmorangie X.

Look - it seems, that Glenmorangie wanted to cut a piece of the sales of Monkey Shoulder. But really it seems like a half-hearted concept:

  • First: the name: X? Really? Should it be X the roman number of 10 (this has been already a bit old since MacOSX, the iPhoneX and so on). Or GenX (which is also aging)... Or is it a repackaged (or a slightly amended) Glenmorangie Original (10 years old)? Overall - I think it is a bad idea.
  • Second: The design. I dig the orange  - and the simplicity. But the psychedelic rainbow is again, too late (or is it too early?) 
  • Third: The community I didn't tried it. However there is no reference to particular bartenders. Also I didn't seen any bartender competition. The guys at William Grants were super creative, to involve bartenders to utilize their Monkey Shoulder. But Glenmorangie X looks totally lazy in this respective.
  • Fourth: the product itself: 40% - no particular information, why it works well in mixing. It is strange. I would expect something with 44% up to 47% - something maybe very young (as mentioned above, Glenmorangie can for sure do something young, and have got a great product). 
  • Fifth the mixing suggestions: Glenmorangie X with Tonic? G.X (They probably should call it similar to this) with sparkling apple juice or ginger beer etc.? Common! It is nothing unique. 
    I don't say, that the drinks don't taste good - I just say, that this isn't unique. The picture on the website use all cobbler ice - which is currently quite trendy, but doesn't really work with the overall approach - big clear ice spheres would work far better.
Looks fancy and wrong...

Personally it looks like product just dreamt up by Marketing. Yes - the master distiller was also bringing his experience. But I don't understand, why they created a product, which simply doesn't play to the strength to the brand - and also didn't really aligned the mixology suggestion to exactly this product.

Example: A very young whisky - maybe even filtered through charcoal (after aging) - not for the maximum effect, but to create a really unique light but distinctively aromatic distillate with loads of floral and fruity aromas.
Mixology: first - use proper bartender - push bars to use it - include competitions etc. Create guidelines, which suggest pear products also suggest light floral honey like acacia. But also: have some pizzazz about the mixing. The simplistic angle works as "add-on" but not as main attraction (especially if the product should be made for mixing).

And anyway - Glenmorangie should really create a Old Tom hybrid gin. As the distillate is anyway very light and fruity, it would work really well. This would also turn heads and would fill up LVMH pockets with money....


Popular posts from this blog

How to use citric acid - and why you might not want to use it anyway!

To be honest, I shied away of this topic, because I think, people can misinterpret this - big time. I don't want to be part of the problem - I want to be part of the solution!  But when Chris, over at A Bar Above  discussed this subject- I literally could not resist to join into "the discussion". Here is the video: I - however take a bit slower approach than Chris. What is citric acid? Chemical Compound Citric acid is a weak organic acid with the formula C6H8O7. It is a natural preservative/conservative and is also used to add an acidic or sour taste to foods and drinks. Wikipedia Formula: C6H8O7 Molar Mass: 192.124 g/mol Melting Point: 153C Density: 1.66 g/cm3 Boiling point: 175C Soluble in: Water Why is it controversial? In my "mixology world" it is controversial, as citric acid is the stuff, which makes the nightmarish sour mix [ preferably in powder form ] sour. Yeah - citric acid is the main ingredient in one of the most

Agar-Agar Clarification

Not often, I am posting here things, which are clearly not my ideas... However Dave Arnold is clearly a mad scientist [no, he really is!] - and he posted amazing stuff on his website - no - don't click now - just follow the link later. One of the most impressive posts about mixology, besides of demystifying the mechanics of shaking, were clarification techniques. Look, after him, you could use a centrifuge [which would set you back a couple thousand bucks] and a chemical compound, which solidifies sediments. I am not a fan of that. Then there is gelatine clarification; this works quite well [I tried it several times my self] - you gelatinize a liquid [with little gelatine only], freeze it, thaw it [in the fridge] over a colander and a muslin cloth. Thats it. Unfortunately this has several problems: Gelatine is made out of animal bones - hence it is neither vegetarian nor vegan, which you won't usually expect of a beverage. You have to freez

King Robert II Vodka

Who would knew, that I am reviewing a budget vodka here - on the But this isn't a normal review. I skip the marketing perception and use this product to cut directly to the case: Vodka is a "rather" neutral, colorless, "rather" flavorless and odorless distilled beverage from any agricultural source - and depending on the country, it has a minimum of 37.5% and 40% abv. As I said time and time again before: at times it is absolutely nonsense to talk about premium and luxury, when the original product doesn't really "hold this promise". Luxury water can have luxurious marketing, luxurious packaging, can be even rare and slightly more expensive "to produce". However really it is just water. Maybe it has some nuances to normal water - however those nuances (in a blind-test) are pretty small. Vodka is extremely similar - and the chain of evidence (despite a lot of people trying to proof otherwise) makes it re