Skip to main content

Paradigm Shifts in the Bar

Not long ago, there was a post about the Singapore Sling on Facebook, and I commented on it. 

Point is, that it is unlikely - or better said, close to impossible, that the contemporary recipe [which is said to be the original recipe] was invented in the 1920's.
Ok - let's first of all see the recipe:

IBAspecified ingredients*
PreparationPour all ingredients into cocktail shaker filled with ice cubes. Shake well. Strain into highball glass. Garnish with pineapple and cocktail cherry.

David Wondrich, one of my favourite cocktail historians discussed the Singapore Sling here.
And I do agree. I like his research, which showed the unlikeliness, that no cherry eau de vie was used - rather than Bols cherry liqueur or Cherry Heering. It seems unlikely, that a drink haven't changed at all for 20 years and thousands of miles.

But what is about Grenadine? And the pineapple juice? And the Cointreau? David Wondrich is not even mentioning it...

Let us come now to the paradigm shift in mixology. You can see above the picture which seems to be a duck - but if watched from a different perspective changes to be a rabbit [however the duck "never can be unseen"].

  1. paradigm shift (or revolutionary science) is, according to Thomas Kuhn, in his influential book The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962), a change in the basic assumptions, or paradigms, within the ruling theory of science. It is in contrast to his idea of normal science.
I don't want to set "mixology" here on the same level as science. However we do understand rules in mixology, and depending on the time, there are a different set of rules - and it seems that there are "shifts" which leads to new liberties but at times also new limits.

The last big paradigm shift in mixology was the renaissance of mixology in the very late 1990 to the early 2000's. You might have heard of it, in case you don't drink some Sex on the Beaches, Alabama Slammers or Blue Kamikaze [and if you do, please do leave my blog immediately!].
PThis is work in progress - but I could make out some [not all] specific points of paradigm shifts:
  • early 1800's: Introduction of the cocktail - spirit, bitters, sugars.
  • mid to late 1800's: popularisation of the "new fashioned cocktail" - spirit, bitters, wine aperitifs
  • early 1900's - mid 1900's: popularisation of sours [earlier International sours, later New Orleans Sours like Margarita, Sidecar etc].
  • mid 1900's to end 1900's: popularisation of exotic drinks [long drinks with exotic juices + use of exotic liqueurs] - part of it are Tiki drinks.
  • early 2000's: resurgence of craft bartending.
Align to these paradigm shifts are inventions and popularisations of products as well, which made the "new breed" of drinks even possible - but at times, other products went out of favour. For example grenadine wasn't used before prohibition and didn't gained traction before WW2 - raspberry syrup was used before - however with the popularisation of grenadine, raspberry syrup lost ground in mixology.
Another detail is technique: e.g. before prohibition, different sweeteners weren't mixed [hence the use of a sweetening liqueur like Cointreau and Cherry Heering, along with grenadine is highly unlikely]. 

At the example of the Singapore sling, it seems impossible in these times [the mid 1920's] that someone have been so outrageous to mix a drink with pineapple juice. Also the thee sweetening syrups would be very unlikely - and last but not least a drink with 8 ingredients is also unlikely for its time.
The Raffle's was at this time a classic (colonial) hotel with a lot of cultivated expats - a drink like that would have been an insult for "contemporary" traditions.

What we can say is, that the recipe is FAKE!


Please comment and further help to define the paradigm shifts in mixology. Looking forward to your SWAGs [Scientific Wild Ass Guesses].


Popular posts from this blog

How to use citric acid - and why you might not want to use it anyway!

To be honest, I shied away of this topic, because I think, people can misinterpret this - big time. I don't want to be part of the problem - I want to be part of the solution!  But when Chris, over at A Bar Above  discussed this subject- I literally could not resist to join into "the discussion". Here is the video: I - however take a bit slower approach than Chris. What is citric acid? Chemical Compound Citric acid is a weak organic acid with the formula C6H8O7. It is a natural preservative/conservative and is also used to add an acidic or sour taste to foods and drinks. Wikipedia Formula: C6H8O7 Molar Mass: 192.124 g/mol Melting Point: 153C Density: 1.66 g/cm3 Boiling point: 175C Soluble in: Water Why is it controversial? In my "mixology world" it is controversial, as citric acid is the stuff, which makes the nightmarish sour mix [ preferably in powder form ] sour. Yeah - citric acid is the main ingredient in one of the most

Agar-Agar Clarification

Not often, I am posting here things, which are clearly not my ideas... However Dave Arnold is clearly a mad scientist [no, he really is!] - and he posted amazing stuff on his website - no - don't click now - just follow the link later. One of the most impressive posts about mixology, besides of demystifying the mechanics of shaking, were clarification techniques. Look, after him, you could use a centrifuge [which would set you back a couple thousand bucks] and a chemical compound, which solidifies sediments. I am not a fan of that. Then there is gelatine clarification; this works quite well [I tried it several times my self] - you gelatinize a liquid [with little gelatine only], freeze it, thaw it [in the fridge] over a colander and a muslin cloth. Thats it. Unfortunately this has several problems: Gelatine is made out of animal bones - hence it is neither vegetarian nor vegan, which you won't usually expect of a beverage. You have to freez

King Robert II Vodka

Who would knew, that I am reviewing a budget vodka here - on the But this isn't a normal review. I skip the marketing perception and use this product to cut directly to the case: Vodka is a "rather" neutral, colorless, "rather" flavorless and odorless distilled beverage from any agricultural source - and depending on the country, it has a minimum of 37.5% and 40% abv. As I said time and time again before: at times it is absolutely nonsense to talk about premium and luxury, when the original product doesn't really "hold this promise". Luxury water can have luxurious marketing, luxurious packaging, can be even rare and slightly more expensive "to produce". However really it is just water. Maybe it has some nuances to normal water - however those nuances (in a blind-test) are pretty small. Vodka is extremely similar - and the chain of evidence (despite a lot of people trying to proof otherwise) makes it re