Skip to main content

Why you don't need two spirits to make good and complex cocktails

Picture via
It is not necessary to mix different spirits in cocktails.

Or let's be a bit more pragmatic - you should not mix different spirits in cocktails.

Some people would argue, that there are vintage recipes, which suggest to use 2 or sometimes even 3 and more different spirits (think about punches). And this is what this post is all about.

Spirits in the past, were very different as spirits today. Most rum, whiskey, gin (...) were far rougher, less refined than today. In this case, mixing two spirits together came handy- a rum, which tasted quite "rummy", but was also quite rough, really benefit out of a brandy with more refined notes.

Fortunately nowadays the picture has changed. Rums often have a finish, which can be described as "cognac-like". And most bars also have sufficient products to chose from. Hence the question is no more: how to make the drink palatable, but: which brand/product do I use, to accomplish the intended character.
Indeed most products are so well made, that I am arguing, that it is a minor offence to mix different distillates. Independently if a quality product is made artisan or rather made in larger volumes, it takes always a lot of knowledge and skills, often history, expertise etc. to end up with a sensory appealing beverage! Mixing two premium beverages almost always end up with a less impressive result.

Examples? Let's look at a "Between the Sheets".

Same proportions of Cognac, light rum and orange liqueur - with a bit of lemon or lime juice.

If you are following the link, you could read the explanation, what David Wondrich is giving for this drink - in a way, I could never express it. 
Most bars would make a Daiquiri with Bacardi or Havana Club white - both everything but stellar rums. Besides of that - it is a refreshing drink for sure, but it lacks the depth of drinks which are made with longer oak aged spirits. 
What could you do instead? Either way, you would go the way of a sidecar, but would use a lighter-bodied cognac (maybe Borderies cognac). Or (which would be rather my choice), you could use an aged rum, like Bacardi 8 anos (best value, for sure).

If we are looking a bit more thorough into the Between the Sheet - no 2 but 3 spirits are used: Brandy/cognac, rum and neutral grain spirit, which is the usual base of orange liqueur.  Reducing it to the orange liqueur and one of the other distillate, will "straighten out" the drink.

Some might argue, making this cocktail with aged rum, or with a specific cognac will not have the same result. My answer: exactly! No really: 
  1. Depending on which cognac, which rum and which orange liqueur you would use, you will end up with a different cocktail.
  2. You probably will end up with a much better tasting cocktail.
  3. Do you really need to make an "authentic" Between the Sheets?
As always it comes down to your own philosophy. You do have one? Don't you?


Popular posts from this blog

How to use citric acid - and why you might not want to use it anyway!

To be honest, I shied away of this topic, because I think, people can misinterpret this - big time. I don't want to be part of the problem - I want to be part of the solution!  But when Chris, over at A Bar Above  discussed this subject- I literally could not resist to join into "the discussion". Here is the video: I - however take a bit slower approach than Chris. What is citric acid? Chemical Compound Citric acid is a weak organic acid with the formula C6H8O7. It is a natural preservative/conservative and is also used to add an acidic or sour taste to foods and drinks. Wikipedia Formula: C6H8O7 Molar Mass: 192.124 g/mol Melting Point: 153C Density: 1.66 g/cm3 Boiling point: 175C Soluble in: Water Why is it controversial? In my "mixology world" it is controversial, as citric acid is the stuff, which makes the nightmarish sour mix [ preferably in powder form ] sour. Yeah - citric acid is the main ingredient in one of the most

Agar-Agar Clarification

Not often, I am posting here things, which are clearly not my ideas... However Dave Arnold is clearly a mad scientist [no, he really is!] - and he posted amazing stuff on his website - no - don't click now - just follow the link later. One of the most impressive posts about mixology, besides of demystifying the mechanics of shaking, were clarification techniques. Look, after him, you could use a centrifuge [which would set you back a couple thousand bucks] and a chemical compound, which solidifies sediments. I am not a fan of that. Then there is gelatine clarification; this works quite well [I tried it several times my self] - you gelatinize a liquid [with little gelatine only], freeze it, thaw it [in the fridge] over a colander and a muslin cloth. Thats it. Unfortunately this has several problems: Gelatine is made out of animal bones - hence it is neither vegetarian nor vegan, which you won't usually expect of a beverage. You have to freez

King Robert II Vodka

Who would knew, that I am reviewing a budget vodka here - on the But this isn't a normal review. I skip the marketing perception and use this product to cut directly to the case: Vodka is a "rather" neutral, colorless, "rather" flavorless and odorless distilled beverage from any agricultural source - and depending on the country, it has a minimum of 37.5% and 40% abv. As I said time and time again before: at times it is absolutely nonsense to talk about premium and luxury, when the original product doesn't really "hold this promise". Luxury water can have luxurious marketing, luxurious packaging, can be even rare and slightly more expensive "to produce". However really it is just water. Maybe it has some nuances to normal water - however those nuances (in a blind-test) are pretty small. Vodka is extremely similar - and the chain of evidence (despite a lot of people trying to proof otherwise) makes it re