Skip to main content

Camacho Corojo - small review...

It has been a while, since I have had a cigar. It has been even a longer time that I had a cigar I have never had - or a cigar which I have reviewed.

Enter the Camacho Corojo.

I don’t need to repeat here the marketing story of Camacho. You can read it here.
If you are too lazy (or resistant to marketing stuff), the important info is: it is a puro - the cigar is made out of 100% Honduras tobacco. It is a long filler. It is made 100% out of corojo tobacco.







Corojo tobacco you might ask? Well, the tobacco is made out of Cuban seed - however this hybrid produces rather wrapper (and binder) tobacco. However in this cigar, it is used to make the full cigar.

You don’t get it yet? Well, in a coffee comparison, corojo is basically Arabica coffee - while criollo tobacco is like Robusta coffee.

The question is - how is it?

There are a ton of cigar reviews, which praises the Camacho Corojo (I had the Robusto today).
Yes - the vitola / banderole is big and quite unsubtle. I would say, it is a matter of taste - I really don’t care about the packaging a lot (well - except when it comes to Arturo Fuente Opus X, which have just amazing - amazing banderoles).

The taste - it is solid - but I wouldn’t give it the credit, so many smokers are giving it.
Don’t get me wrong here - it is a good, earthy smoke; from the beginning to almost the end (it becomes a bit aggressive and “coughy” at the end - but this is normal for so many cigars.

I don’t get too much into the aromas - yeah you get some pepper spiciness and some earthy aromas. Again - aromas are quite subjective.
But my overall impression is: it seems to taste like a great value cigar... - again; what do I mean with that??
Think about cars: it is analogue to a (Hyundai) Genesis. Overall a great car for the money. It has a stance, it looks quite good. It is good value for money - but if you compare it to the “big dawgs” like a Mercedes S class or a BMW 7 series, it just lacks some real excellence.  The problem (at least here in the UAE) is, that it isn’t really value. I bought it for shy under AED 100 (which would be around $27), and you could get a pretty good Habanos for the same price. I would rather buy a Partagas (Series D No. 4) or a smoother and easier to smoke Montecristo Edmundo instead of this Honduras cigar. It seems like an interpretation of a Cuban cigar. Not a carbon copy, but an inspiration to Cuba.

If I would like to buy a box to age it, again I would go with a Cuban, instead of this Camacho.

I am not so sure, if Davidoff did Camacho a favor, in redesigning and especially “reconcepting and reformulating” their line up. Before I had the feeling, that there were really cool and unique Camachos around, some very cool oddballs but overall very smoke’able cigars which were basically stood apart. Now I feel, that Davidoff, set Camacho apart, to not interfere towards their “original house-brands”. And while smoking it without context is great, it seems for the seasoned cigar smoker almost as a forgettable stodgy. 

I will for sure smoke other Camacho cigars - maybe they have something more unique and outstanding. But sometimes being good, is not enough - and, as mentioned in this market, it is for sure not a superior option.
Here in Dubai (or the UAE) it is a tourist cigar. It is easier available (as the company has their shops in the shopping malls, which are far easier to access as the “La Casa del Habanos”.

What also has to be said: I think, the cigar could have used more humidity. It had a fantastic draw (I am though more a connoisseur, who likes tighter draws, when the cigar is well made and especially for strong cigars) - but the aromas could have been a bit smoother and deeper, when the cigar would have stored at about 75-80% humidity (I estimate, that it has been around the mid 60s).

Did you smoked this cigar before - what do you think about it? What do you think about my comparison? And do you like more cigar reviews like that?

Please feel free and comment below!








Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to use citric acid - and why you might not want to use it anyway!

To be honest, I shied away of this topic, because I think, people can misinterpret this - big time.


I don't want to be part of the problem - I want to be part of the solution! But when Chris, over at A Bar Above discussed this subject- I literally could not resist to join into "the discussion".

Here is the video:





I - however take a bit slower approach than Chris.
What is citric acid?
Chemical Compound
Citric acid is a weak organic acid with the formula C6H8O7. It is a natural preservative/conservative and is also used to add an acidic or sour taste to foods and drinks.
Wikipedia Formula: C6H8O7
Molar Mass: 192.124 g/mol
Melting Point: 153C
Density: 1.66 g/cm3
Boiling point: 175C
Soluble in: Water
Why is it controversial?
In my "mixology world" it is controversial, as citric acid is the stuff, which makes the nightmarish sour mix [preferably in powder form] sour. Yeah - citric acid is the main ingredient in one of the most controversial [and in the modern craft bartending wor…

The Best Alcohol-free Drink - Ipanema

Usually I call them [out of laziness] mocktails - but really I never liked this denomination.
As "mocktails" are usually long drinks, it is even twice wrong, to connect them to a cocktail [which is technically a short drink with alcohol]. 
Apart of this, I am not a big believer in mocktails. Sodas can be fantastic [home made grapefruit soda is fantastic, or homemade ginger ale, ginger beer or any other odd ingredient sodas]. Juices - fine. Lemonades - yes, refreshing and good. And iced teas - can be absolutely amazing. Hence you don't need sickly sweet syrupy juice mixtures.
But yes - there are few good ones.
Most of them a mimicking drinks with alcohol. You can make a pretty good alcohol-free Planters Punch, Hurricane or Mojito, if you are using Caribbean Syrup. Or you can use a juniper syrup for some alcohol-free gin drinks.
A drink which I got to know long time ago, very early in my career, is a bit a different beast [well - you cannot call an alcohol-free drink a bea…

Do not do that! - DO NOT POISON YOUR GUESTS!!!

Dear Bartenders,

Please do not make tobacco infusions! I am serious - don't do it - don't try it - do not think about it.
Tobacco contains nicotine. What is the big deal, you might ask? Nicotine is highly poisonous. There is not as much nicotine absorption when you are smoking tobacco - this would be rather save.  Chewing tobacco - has a higher absorption - but yet, isn't soluble in water (hence it is still "quite save").

On the other hand, nicotine is soluble in alcohol - that means there is a great absorption - and it becomes very very dangerous.

How dangerous, you might ask? 

Let me ask a counter question:

Would you make a strychnine infusion? Or a cyanide cocktail? Or an arsenic essence?

The lethal dose of strychnine (for a male healthy adult) would be ca. 100 mgThe lethal dose of cyanide (...) would be ca. 200 mgThe lethal dose of arsenic (...) would be more than 70 mg

While the lethal dose of nicotine (for a male healthy adult) would be ca. 60 mg or less!

This…