Skip to main content

Drinks in the age of fake news

I like Punch. It is an online magazine about drinks. About cocktails. Mostly cutting edge. It is an inspiration.

One of their latest article made me wonder: 
Look, my routine of making drinks involves quite unique techniques (compared to a normal "mixologist"). Techniques include using immersion circulators (precision "cooking"), using a vacuum pump and off course vacuum sealers and so on. But Microwaving stuff? Nope.

So I read this article - and unfortunately Ryan Chetiyawardana is squabbling quite a lot of sciency gibberish - which the editor of the article just loves to "take in" and spread.

From my perspective, the microwave oven just offers one particular advantage: it heats up liquids quickly. To be honest, I love to cook things in the microwave (vegetables are steamed perfectly in a  microwave and it is quicker and easier than anything else!) - but it failed to impress me, for cocktails.

Probably because I am using a far more exact version of the same technique: I am using an immersion circulator to heat things (and infuse them quickly - but also far more controlled). Heat is the magic here - and other than on the stove, where a closed container is pretty awkward (you are risking that some of your alcohol is evaporating - or even overcooking) - you heat quickly in the microwave and afterwards it is chilling down. 

The sous vide technique though is far more exact, and you have tons of more flexibility (different cell walls are breaking down in different ways at different temperatures, there are enzymes, which are becoming active at some specific temperatures and so on).

Hence in Ryan Chetiyawardana case, he used the Microwave as "clickbait" or shocker, so people get more excited about his techniques.

Can you do something unique in the microwave? I nuked a small piece of oak (ex-Jack Daniels barrel) in  the microwave for 2 minutes - and it started to smoke like insane. Perfect to smoke your meat or fish - but the piece of wood also broke from inside out, which made it perfect for an oak infusion (I put the still hot wood into the Sazerac whisky). This should be an interesting experiment (but being  me, I put it into a 63ºC water-bath for a quick infusion). The microwave did here, what a normal heating method simply could not do: changing the structure of the oak (not sure if I should recommend this technique though  - 2 minutes seemed to be a pretty long time and resulted into a lot of rather intense smoke, which filled my apartment...).
This is really something, I am persuading.

For Chetiyawardana mythical claims, I am very very careful - and rather very critical. I haven't heard of any large food company, which uses microwaves to "smoothen" flavors (...) - and they would be the first ones which would use tech like that... and there is little scientific reality, which supports his shamanic faux scientific explanation.

But... what do you think?


Popular posts from this blog

How to use citric acid - and why you might not want to use it anyway!

To be honest, I shied away of this topic, because I think, people can misinterpret this - big time. I don't want to be part of the problem - I want to be part of the solution!  But when Chris, over at A Bar Above  discussed this subject- I literally could not resist to join into "the discussion". Here is the video: I - however take a bit slower approach than Chris. What is citric acid? Chemical Compound Citric acid is a weak organic acid with the formula C6H8O7. It is a natural preservative/conservative and is also used to add an acidic or sour taste to foods and drinks. Wikipedia Formula: C6H8O7 Molar Mass: 192.124 g/mol Melting Point: 153C Density: 1.66 g/cm3 Boiling point: 175C Soluble in: Water Why is it controversial? In my "mixology world" it is controversial, as citric acid is the stuff, which makes the nightmarish sour mix [ preferably in powder form ] sour. Yeah - citric acid is the main ingredient in one of the most

Fentiman's - part deux

You might already know [otherwise just read my last post ], that Fentiman's Botanical Tonic Water taste great. And I mentioned, that I am not totally convinced of the other flavours... Let me now and here explain why. First to the great ones: Rose Lemonade is really nice... however I have to come across one rose drink, which doesn't taste really good. A couple of years I have reviewed [and tried] Sence - also a drink which is based on Bulgarian roses - and it was lovely. Fentiman's Rose Lemonade is not different - maybe slightly too acidic. Anyway - it is just great [however also very simple to replicate - citric acid, sugar syrup, carbonated water and rose water is all what you need...]. The Curiousity Cola is also nice - it is a bit more standalone and unique as other cola sodas- but hit the right spots. Only problem still is: the original just taste better and - well like the original. Cherrybark Cola - is another good soda. While I've expected it to taste

What is the best cranberry juice in the bar?

A good friend of me "whatsapp'ed" me today and asked for my expertise: "What is the best cranberry juice?" I would loved to just let him know the brand - however it is not that easy. What do we understand of cranberry juice? One of the biggest [maybe the  biggest producer] of cranberry products is Ocean Spray. And: it is well regarded. Problem is: it is not a juice! Wait - what? Ocean Spray doesn't produce a juice - they produce a juice cocktail - which translates into a lot of water, a lot of sugar, some taste-balancers as citric acid [nothing against this really] and a minuscule portion of juice - usually around 3%. Yes they have something which is called 100% juice. Which is on one hand true, on the other the biggest deception ever. Because you don't get 100% cranberry - you get a mixture of juices of concentrate - most of the time apple and white grape and a bit of cranberry. There are also some other brands around, which might feature a h