Skip to main content

The Problem with tea...

Only due to the fact, that I am for the moment exploring the possibilities of tea infused beers, I stumbled over this issue...
If you are buying a fancy green [or black] tea, you have most of the time small blossoms and flower petals, pieces of fruit rind, dried fruits and other interesting things laying among the tea leaves.

This is all decoy!

This "botanicals" won't give a lot of additional aroma to the tea.

But stop - why is aromatized tea tasting so fruity, zesty, spicy...?
Because the producers are bathing the tea leaves in essences and oils from the fruit. Or even not from the fruit.

See - one pretty well known example is, that you can produce a strong strawberry aroma, if you are manipulate wood splints. The essence out of it, you will find quite in everything, which says, that it contains "strawberry flavor". But hold on - now comes the bummer: as wood chips are a natural source, producer can say: natural strawberry flavors!

I am not totally aware, what else can be used to produce other flavors and aromas. But nowadays I am very carefully, when I read ingredients lists. Well usually I pass the natural aromas - because nowadays it becomes extremely hard, to avoid this.

For me, it seems quite confusing, that most tea producers [even the expensive ones] are using these commercial & industrial aromas. And they won't tell you! Tea is considered natural and authentic. And tea connoisseurs seem to believe this very much - but in fact it is just another product which deceive its customers.

Please understand - I don't mean here any classic Darjeeling, ceylon tea, sencha, gunpowder etc.
I mean aromatized tea. It is also pretty well known, that Earl Grey contains oils of bergamotte oranges - this defines this tea. But it seems for me, that just the oils from the peels out of a citrus is not the main problem here.

But the stronger and "fruitier" something [not only tea] taste, the more you could vouch, that the industry is standing behind the product and backing the flavors up.
I don't think [or lets rather say: I don't hope] that the aromas are unhealthy. However all these "artificially-boosted" flavors just screws with our palate and our expectations of a great product.

Funny thing is, that flavored vodkas taste more "natural" - or lets better say, they taste more like the fresh fruit - than eaux de vie, which is made 100% of the respective fruit!
That's why customers expecting, that an strawberry cocktail, taste like fresh strawberries. Even if the strawberries are out of season. Even if strawberries never taste as strong as in a product, which is aromatized.

Coming back to tea drinkers, it is even more concerning, because tea connoisseurs are usually more conscious about their preferred brew.
Let's just try to focus more on authentic and natural tasting products.

E.g. I've tasted today two traditional Japanese teas for our Japanese restaurant. A Hojicha [a Japanese roasted green tea, which is even using thin branches instead of only the tea leaves] and a Genmaicha [green tea with the addition of roasted rice]. They taste very robust but also very interesting and different as your normal sencha. Even as "sweet tea drinker" I don't reject those teas without sugar [but they even taste better with]. And you won't have any fake papaya flavors coming with it.

I would appreciate further insights in tea - or do you know more about the practices of the aroma industry? Please share below!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to use citric acid - and why you might not want to use it anyway!

To be honest, I shied away of this topic, because I think, people can misinterpret this - big time.


I don't want to be part of the problem - I want to be part of the solution! But when Chris, over at A Bar Above discussed this subject- I literally could not resist to join into "the discussion".

Here is the video:





I - however take a bit slower approach than Chris.
What is citric acid?
Chemical Compound
Citric acid is a weak organic acid with the formula C6H8O7. It is a natural preservative/conservative and is also used to add an acidic or sour taste to foods and drinks.
Wikipedia Formula: C6H8O7
Molar Mass: 192.124 g/mol
Melting Point: 153C
Density: 1.66 g/cm3
Boiling point: 175C
Soluble in: Water
Why is it controversial?
In my "mixology world" it is controversial, as citric acid is the stuff, which makes the nightmarish sour mix [preferably in powder form] sour. Yeah - citric acid is the main ingredient in one of the most controversial [and in the modern craft bartending wor…

The "perfect" Whiskey Sour

After the high popularity of my Mojito post - as well as the also well liked post about the Diablo, I would like to highlight here, another bar staple: The humble Whiskey Sour.

Also: if you can make a proper Whiskey Sour, you can do a lot of other Sours - basically you can take any distillate and make a Sour out of it...

I call it the "perfect" Whiskey Sour to be obviously a bit provocative - but also, as you get often a less than perfect drink, when you are ordering one.

So what are the ingredients of a Whiskey Sour?

American Whiskey [yes - I say it: definitely no Scotch, also for sure no Canadian, no Irish and obviously no Japanese]Truth has to be told - there is definitely something like an adequate Scotch Sour. But it should simply not be called Whiskey Sour, as the character is totally different. Period!Lemon JuiceSugarOptional egg white Additional to the ingredients, these features are also important to consider: Balance between sweet and sourIngredient proportionsA prope…

Is Jack Daniel's a Bourbon Whiskey?

So Jack Daniels want to make us believe, that it is not a bourbon - but it meets all standards of a bourbon - only it is better?!

Half of it is true: Jack Daniels meets all qualification points for a bourbon. And yes it is true, that they add one more step - the charcoal mellowing. However this doesn't make it not a bourbon.

Well - point is, that the question is not really adequate. The answers to the rather vague question: "Is Jack Daniels a Bourbon?" is driven by semantics and interpretations.

What you could ask is: Can Jack Daniels rightly be called bourbon?
And the answer is: yes, it can. It meets all points to be even a Straight Bourbon [however please note the differentiation to Kentucky Straight Bourbon - as this is again a regional denomination, which Jack Daniels obviously doesn't meet].
The video is explaining exactly the laws. Before Jack Daniels also stated very proud, that they are sour mash. This was a bit... misleading, as most American Straight Whisk…