Skip to main content

Form follows function- work flair in a bar

My recent post, which proclaims the early death of exhibition flair just stirred up some dust (as expected). However the discussion on LinkedIn was much  ore thoughtful than I thought it would be, and I gained quite a lot of ideas, which will benefit the concept of "my style of bar".

Unfortunately most commenters didn't really made the distinction between work flair and exhibition flair. While both styles are rather ideals - and can be seen as extremes, one great cocncept sparked my mind:

Form follows function & function follows the form.

It is a bit yin & yang. But it makes a lot of sense: exhibition flair is all about form. It abstracts the idea of barkeeping to a rather gaudy performance. See exhibition like a Vertu phone - an extravagant device, which does every single task worse than pretty much any other smart phone. This happens when the sole vision is superficial. You could take now an Android phone, which is open source and has a ton of functions and options as your mixology bar. Is it boring? No, unless you are not shallow as... Barbie... Is it the effect device? For a lot!
And then take an iPhone which mixes style, with substance and sacrifices some freedom for more accessibility. This is your bar, which uses work flair, while still focussing on produce.

For a long time, a serious bar (most of the times hotel bars), flair bars, bars which featured bar tricks  and craft bars, existed in a type of vacuum - they all existed parallel without overlapping. But going forward, we have to find ways, to incorporate the best features of the separate styles to find the best enticing form to date.

Customers today don't want to be faced towards a gaudy show, they don't want to admire some one. They want to be in the point of reference, they want to be the focus. Hence bartenders from all trades have to refocus, to stir the lime light for themselves towards the guest.

The goal are a artisan working style, which showcase a restraint and understatement.

It is just like in so many martial arts movies, where the masters are always shown as unassuming, unostentatious and discreet - without being too understated or introverted. In certain situation they are also always showing skill, composure and most of the time self-humor (well, please don't watch ax Bruce Lee movie which works in most of the cases a bit different).

Besides of implementing and embracing a much more subtle flair style (max one bottle, max time per task of execution etc), it is important to invent details which consistently wow the guest without being ostentatious and without diverting the lime light to oneself.

I love the whole idea to "revive the magic in the bar", however have not a lot of ideas, what to think of (except the more subtle way of work flair).

Any ideas?


Popular posts from this blog

How to use citric acid - and why you might not want to use it anyway!

To be honest, I shied away of this topic, because I think, people can misinterpret this - big time. I don't want to be part of the problem - I want to be part of the solution!  But when Chris, over at A Bar Above  discussed this subject- I literally could not resist to join into "the discussion". Here is the video: I - however take a bit slower approach than Chris. What is citric acid? Chemical Compound Citric acid is a weak organic acid with the formula C6H8O7. It is a natural preservative/conservative and is also used to add an acidic or sour taste to foods and drinks. Wikipedia Formula: C6H8O7 Molar Mass: 192.124 g/mol Melting Point: 153C Density: 1.66 g/cm3 Boiling point: 175C Soluble in: Water Why is it controversial? In my "mixology world" it is controversial, as citric acid is the stuff, which makes the nightmarish sour mix [ preferably in powder form ] sour. Yeah - citric acid is the main ingredient in one of the most

Agar-Agar Clarification

Not often, I am posting here things, which are clearly not my ideas... However Dave Arnold is clearly a mad scientist [no, he really is!] - and he posted amazing stuff on his website - no - don't click now - just follow the link later. One of the most impressive posts about mixology, besides of demystifying the mechanics of shaking, were clarification techniques. Look, after him, you could use a centrifuge [which would set you back a couple thousand bucks] and a chemical compound, which solidifies sediments. I am not a fan of that. Then there is gelatine clarification; this works quite well [I tried it several times my self] - you gelatinize a liquid [with little gelatine only], freeze it, thaw it [in the fridge] over a colander and a muslin cloth. Thats it. Unfortunately this has several problems: Gelatine is made out of animal bones - hence it is neither vegetarian nor vegan, which you won't usually expect of a beverage. You have to freez

King Robert II Vodka

Who would knew, that I am reviewing a budget vodka here - on the But this isn't a normal review. I skip the marketing perception and use this product to cut directly to the case: Vodka is a "rather" neutral, colorless, "rather" flavorless and odorless distilled beverage from any agricultural source - and depending on the country, it has a minimum of 37.5% and 40% abv. As I said time and time again before: at times it is absolutely nonsense to talk about premium and luxury, when the original product doesn't really "hold this promise". Luxury water can have luxurious marketing, luxurious packaging, can be even rare and slightly more expensive "to produce". However really it is just water. Maybe it has some nuances to normal water - however those nuances (in a blind-test) are pretty small. Vodka is extremely similar - and the chain of evidence (despite a lot of people trying to proof otherwise) makes it re