Skip to main content

Another controversy: High Rye Bourbons are not spicier than Traditional Bourbons

This is a bit more technical. A discussion for those who feel quite confident in spirits [well, you might be also a bit geeky]:

If you are reading articles about Bourbon you will earlier or later stumble upon one "golden rule": Straight Bourbons with high rye contents in their mash bill are said to be spicier. And traditional Straight Bourbons supposed to be more balanced [and wheated Bourbons supposed to be a bit softer and sweeter].
Well - I do agree about the softer character of wheated bourbons. Most of us will have wheated bourbons in mind, which are exactly like it: Maker's Mark, Larcency or Pappy van Winkle (...).

However - I am confused about the others. Lets list some of them:

Bourbons with high rye content:

  • Four Roses
  • Basil Hayden
  • Old Grand Dad
  • Bulleit
  • Old Forrester
Bourbons with traditional [rather high corn content] mashbill:
  • Jim Beam
  • Jack Daniel's (yeah, I know, it is Tennessee, however still is covered by the Straight Bourbon administration laws)
  • George Dickel (as Jack Daniel's, a Tennessee Bourbon)
  • Wild Turkey
  • Woodford Reserve
  • Evan Williams
  • Elijah Craig
  • Buffalo Trace
  • Woodford Reserve
  • Fighting Cock
  • Knob Creek
  • Booker's
Well - the second category could go on and on.

But here is the problem: at least two of the high rye bourbons are real "soft-talkers" [Four Roses and Basil Hayden] and some of the traditional [high corn] bourbons are real rowdies [if it comes to aromas].
Especially Wild Turkey is really spicy and the rye is really coming out quite obvious. But also Jack Daniel's in not sweet and smooth [lets forget for a moment Booker's, which is due to its cask strength anyway a real rowdy].

So my opinion is that: Bourbon cannot really be characterized by taste, if it is made with a high rye or high corn content.

I really have to try some more whiskeys to proof it to my self. But in my eyes the rule isn't applying, if in fact 2 of 5 popular high rye bourbons are not as they supposed to be.

Please guys help me to understand... please comment below!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to use citric acid - and why you might not want to use it anyway!

To be honest, I shied away of this topic, because I think, people can misinterpret this - big time.


I don't want to be part of the problem - I want to be part of the solution! But when Chris, over at A Bar Above discussed this subject- I literally could not resist to join into "the discussion".

Here is the video:





I - however take a bit slower approach than Chris.
What is citric acid?
Chemical Compound
Citric acid is a weak organic acid with the formula C6H8O7. It is a natural preservative/conservative and is also used to add an acidic or sour taste to foods and drinks.
Wikipedia Formula: C6H8O7
Molar Mass: 192.124 g/mol
Melting Point: 153C
Density: 1.66 g/cm3
Boiling point: 175C
Soluble in: Water
Why is it controversial?
In my "mixology world" it is controversial, as citric acid is the stuff, which makes the nightmarish sour mix [preferably in powder form] sour. Yeah - citric acid is the main ingredient in one of the most controversial [and in the modern craft bartending wor…

Is Jack Daniel's a Bourbon Whiskey?

So Jack Daniels want to make us believe, that it is not a bourbon - but it meets all standards of a bourbon - only it is better?!

Half of it is true: Jack Daniels meets all qualification points for a bourbon. And yes it is true, that they add one more step - the charcoal mellowing. However this doesn't make it not a bourbon.

Well - point is, that the question is not really adequate. The answers to the rather vague question: "Is Jack Daniels a Bourbon?" is driven by semantics and interpretations.

What you could ask is: Can Jack Daniels rightly be called bourbon?
And the answer is: yes, it can. It meets all points to be even a Straight Bourbon [however please note the differentiation to Kentucky Straight Bourbon - as this is again a regional denomination, which Jack Daniels obviously doesn't meet].
The video is explaining exactly the laws. Before Jack Daniels also stated very proud, that they are sour mash. This was a bit... misleading, as most American Straight Whisk…

Secrets of Darcy - this is the best way to create sugar syrup

I am a "rich syrup guy"... not a "simple syrup guy".
This is, because it is better to be able to control dilution by yourself - not by he setup you have got.

I had also a pretty straight forward method: adding 1 kg sugar into 1/2 liter of cold water and blend until dissolved (be carefully, not to blend too long with a high-performance blender, because it would heat up).

The issue here: it takes some time - because sugar doesn't "like" to dissolve in cold liquid.

A lot of bartenders are adding sugar into hot liquid. This isn't a good idea either: due to hydrolysis the sucrose is converting into fructose and glucose. This makes the sugar thicker and sweeter - but also makes the result less consistent (as you don't meticulously monitor all details (time, temperature, pH, etc.). Further the thickness of the glucose worsen the ability of the syrup to mix in cold liquid (speak a cocktail).

Darcy, of artofdrink.com has a profound chemistry insight a…