Skip to main content

New laws for alcoholic beverages are urgently needed!

Since a couple of years, we do have the trend for micro-distilleries and boutique (you could them "craft") spirits.

Even longer we do have some "rogue" creativeness which is often more a plague than a blessing.

You want to know, why I am thinking this way?

Look - I don't have anything against creative beverages. I even welcome them with open hands. But the point I can't stand if beverage categories are muddled up! Why? Because it confuses basically everyone.

Here is an example found on Munchies
A soju made out of grapes.

But you really have to ask yourself, what does make this distillate to a soju?

It is traditionally Korean or Japanese (then you would spell it shōchū).

It is usually made out of barley, sweet potatoes, buckwheat, rice - even brown sugar.

It is usually distilled and has a lower alcohol percentage compared to Western spirits.
Now - our example here is made in the US and is made out of grapes. Why are they calling it soju???

I have to admit, that this Yobo soju is not the first brand, which made this annoying move. Think of vodka : I guess the first major brand which didn't distilled vodka out of grain or potatoes (again - please note, that a minuscule part of vodka - anytime in its history; was made out of potato) was Ciroc. And now you do have vodkas basically made out of anything. I have to admit, that for vodka it is kind of novel... still - these type of rogue categorization tend to mess with every ones head, and people just have a hard time to understand spirits.

What is the difference between a "clear grape brandy", a grape eau de vie, a grape based vodka and a grape based soju? Who ever could list the differences, is already quite an expert - for the rest: exactly - this is the point!

You could argue that it is good for the diversity of the spirit market: I put against: Even if you have very controlled and regulated spirits (think Straight Bourbon, Scotch Single Malt Whisky, Cognac, even or better especially London Dry Gin) there are still a lot of differences, and a lot of options how to differentiate the spirit. 
It is just not such an easy way out for the producer!


Update: so I slept some nights over this post - and I thought, that there is definitely a verdict missing!

So yes- spirits should be protected by law, for what they are. A whisk(e)y should be a distillate, which is made from grains (only) and aged in oak (entirely). The WTO should "take care of this" - but also the individual governments. Rum, supposed to be a distillate made out of sugarcane molasses (entirely) or sugarcane "honey" - also be aged a minimum time in oak (entirely) - with no significant amounts of sugar or other additives added! Basically every single spirit - every alcoholic beverage should have a outline, which is protected.

There is still enough leeway- and only because the existing distillates are protected doesn't mean, that you could not make a "new" category. 


Popular posts from this blog

How to use citric acid - and why you might not want to use it anyway!

To be honest, I shied away of this topic, because I think, people can misinterpret this - big time.

I don't want to be part of the problem - I want to be part of the solution! But when Chris, over at A Bar Above discussed this subject- I literally could not resist to join into "the discussion".

Here is the video:

I - however take a bit slower approach than Chris.
What is citric acid?
Chemical Compound
Citric acid is a weak organic acid with the formula C6H8O7. It is a natural preservative/conservative and is also used to add an acidic or sour taste to foods and drinks.
Wikipedia Formula: C6H8O7
Molar Mass: 192.124 g/mol
Melting Point: 153C
Density: 1.66 g/cm3
Boiling point: 175C
Soluble in: Water
Why is it controversial?
In my "mixology world" it is controversial, as citric acid is the stuff, which makes the nightmarish sour mix [preferably in powder form] sour. Yeah - citric acid is the main ingredient in one of the most controversial [and in the modern craft bartending wor…

Is Jack Daniel's a Bourbon Whiskey?

So Jack Daniels want to make us believe, that it is not a bourbon - but it meets all standards of a bourbon - only it is better?!

Half of it is true: Jack Daniels meets all qualification points for a bourbon. And yes it is true, that they add one more step - the charcoal mellowing. However this doesn't make it not a bourbon.

Well - point is, that the question is not really adequate. The answers to the rather vague question: "Is Jack Daniels a Bourbon?" is driven by semantics and interpretations.

What you could ask is: Can Jack Daniels rightly be called bourbon?
And the answer is: yes, it can. It meets all points to be even a Straight Bourbon [however please note the differentiation to Kentucky Straight Bourbon - as this is again a regional denomination, which Jack Daniels obviously doesn't meet].
The video is explaining exactly the laws. Before Jack Daniels also stated very proud, that they are sour mash. This was a bit... misleading, as most American Straight Whisk…

Secrets of Darcy - this is the best way to create sugar syrup

I am a "rich syrup guy"... not a "simple syrup guy".
This is, because it is better to be able to control dilution by yourself - not by he setup you have got.

I had also a pretty straight forward method: adding 1 kg sugar into 1/2 liter of cold water and blend until dissolved (be carefully, not to blend too long with a high-performance blender, because it would heat up).

The issue here: it takes some time - because sugar doesn't "like" to dissolve in cold liquid.

A lot of bartenders are adding sugar into hot liquid. This isn't a good idea either: due to hydrolysis the sucrose is converting into fructose and glucose. This makes the sugar thicker and sweeter - but also makes the result less consistent (as you don't meticulously monitor all details (time, temperature, pH, etc.). Further the thickness of the glucose worsen the ability of the syrup to mix in cold liquid (speak a cocktail).

Darcy, of has a profound chemistry insight a…