Skip to main content

In defense of the Martini Extra Dry

People who order Martinis which aren’t bone dry probably eat also children.

People who order and drink Martinis which aren’t extra dry, probably have no taste buds.

People... dammit - just don’t drink your Martini cocktail wet!!!


Since a couple of years you hear and read, that XYZ bartender is doing a Martini which has more vermouth in. Sometimes ⅓ vermouth - and now there are even so-named bartenders, which suggest a 50:50 Martini cocktail.

Their arguments sound totally reasonable: the cocktail becomes more sessionable (you can drink more than one or two, without ending up in the alley). And the taste (if the drink is made with proper vermouth) improves... All of it though is rubbish!

Look - this “goals” make not a lot of sense. making the martini cocktail more sessionable or “tasty” is like: making a LaFerrari hypercar more tame and practical... or making a fighter jet more luxurious... or making a Carolina Reaper easier to eat. If you don’t get the context it might sound, reasonable - but if you understand a little of the specific topic, you understand that the respective adjustment doesn’t make any sense: A hypercar is purchased by people, who like the ridiculousness - it is never a daily driver nor is it a car for travels. And a fighter jet is a war-tool; a weapon. No government does need anything luxury in a fighter jet. And a Carolina Reaper has been designed (well cultivated) to be one of the hottest pepper of the world - why would anyone make it easier to eat, while it has been just popularized, as almost impossible to consume.

A Martini Extra Dry is not as obvious, but if you do understand, what the drink is all about, you understand, that the supporters for a wetter martini probably still wet their beds...

Look people: the Martini is a drink, which clears the mind. It is strong, it is cold, you drink it in a few sips. The “clutter” in your brain, which convoluted your mind, clears immediately out. Your stomach gets quite a punch, which make you realize, that you should go out and have a reasonable good dinner. The alcohol probably suggest, that you should not have the dinner alone, but with good (attractive) company.

Is a Martini cocktail delicious?
No! Never. But this isn’t the point.

And even with the most beautiful artisan vermouth, it still stays a challenged cocktail. Like Sylvester Stallone is a challenged actor, who can only play well himself. Don’t get me wrong - I like Stallone - but he won’t be anytime soon a Marlon Brando.

And also don’t get me wrong here. I am not here to dismantle the virtues of the Martini Cocktail. I am just here speak against those people, who destroying the legitimacy of the Martini Cocktail Extra Dry unknowingly, because  they have no clue, what the cocktail is about. Because they are so mislead by adjusting every single drink to make it more palatable, that they totally forget bar culture.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to use citric acid - and why you might not want to use it anyway!

To be honest, I shied away of this topic, because I think, people can misinterpret this - big time. I don't want to be part of the problem - I want to be part of the solution!  But when Chris, over at A Bar Above  discussed this subject- I literally could not resist to join into "the discussion". Here is the video: I - however take a bit slower approach than Chris. What is citric acid? Chemical Compound Citric acid is a weak organic acid with the formula C6H8O7. It is a natural preservative/conservative and is also used to add an acidic or sour taste to foods and drinks. Wikipedia Formula: C6H8O7 Molar Mass: 192.124 g/mol Melting Point: 153C Density: 1.66 g/cm3 Boiling point: 175C Soluble in: Water Why is it controversial? In my "mixology world" it is controversial, as citric acid is the stuff, which makes the nightmarish sour mix [ preferably in powder form ] sour. Yeah - citric acid is the main ingredient in one of the most

Agar-Agar Clarification

Not often, I am posting here things, which are clearly not my ideas... However Dave Arnold is clearly a mad scientist [no, he really is!] - and he posted amazing stuff on his website www.cookingissues.com - no - don't click now - just follow the link later. One of the most impressive posts about mixology, besides of demystifying the mechanics of shaking, were clarification techniques. Look, after him, you could use a centrifuge [which would set you back a couple thousand bucks] and a chemical compound, which solidifies sediments. I am not a fan of that. Then there is gelatine clarification; this works quite well [I tried it several times my self] - you gelatinize a liquid [with little gelatine only], freeze it, thaw it [in the fridge] over a colander and a muslin cloth. Thats it. Unfortunately this has several problems: Gelatine is made out of animal bones - hence it is neither vegetarian nor vegan, which you won't usually expect of a beverage. You have to freez

King Robert II Vodka

Who would knew, that I am reviewing a budget vodka here - on the opinionatedalchemist.com. But this isn't a normal review. I skip the marketing perception and use this product to cut directly to the case: Vodka is a "rather" neutral, colorless, "rather" flavorless and odorless distilled beverage from any agricultural source - and depending on the country, it has a minimum of 37.5% and 40% abv. As I said time and time again before: at times it is absolutely nonsense to talk about premium and luxury, when the original product doesn't really "hold this promise". Luxury water can have luxurious marketing, luxurious packaging, can be even rare and slightly more expensive "to produce". However really it is just water. Maybe it has some nuances to normal water - however those nuances (in a blind-test) are pretty small. Vodka is extremely similar - and the chain of evidence (despite a lot of people trying to proof otherwise) makes it re