Skip to main content

The misconception of Old Tom Gin

Some vintage Old Tom Gins
These days I have thought a lot about gin. There are a lot of gins coming on the market and some people are already calling it the “new vodka”.

While I do understand this notion, it is (out of my humble perspective) not at all comparable.
Yes - gin has been really exploited in marketing (like vodka) - but it is really like any mainstream trend. Vodka has been always a bit different: while a lot of gins have significant differences (especially due to their different botanicals) - quality vodkas lack the big differences and their subtle differences are subdued within the different moods people are in - or what they have eaten for breakfast or lunch, or if they had one drink before or simply with the mixers, the vodka is consumed with.

Anyway - one big topic I have contemplated about is Old Tom Gin. In my eyes, this style has been largely misrepresented and misunderstood.

The otherwise informative article in Imbibe shows exactly the issue - people get mislead by marketing of liquor companies which are selling their OTG with the fairytale of century old forgotten family recipe (call me a sceptic, or pessimist - but I don't "effing" one more spirit brand ambassador, who refers to the long history, unless he/xhe can proof it 100% - inclusive original and certified documents).
The big fallacy in gin is, to underestimate time.
Look, the difference between London Dry Gin and Old Tom Gin hasn’t been really that striking in the late 19th century. Why? Because spirits are not static, but they are evolving with their environment.

The most significant change for gin in the 19th century has been the “invention” (or should we rather say improvement) of the continuous still  (aka patent or Coffey still).

In the first half of the 19th century, the base of gin has been so called malt wines - more or less unaged whisky (probably mass produced Lowland Scotch). The point is, that the unmastured alcohol out of this process is quite harsh. The addition of sugar (today regularly used in a lot of different spirits), which is called rounding, would make harsh alcohol palatable.

Hence especially the first 50 (or more) years of Old Tom gin, the gin has been for sure sweetened - however as soon as the Coffey Still spirits took more and more over the “neutral alcohol” origin, Old Tom Gin was more and more developing into London Dry Gin style.

The big fallacy of a lot of people (inclusive brands, distillers etc) is, to see Old Tom Gin and London Dry Gin unlinked and as two independent styles.

Late Old Tom gins however were much closer to London Dry Gin, and would not make the difference, as most people would like to see - but in fact they are more “hybrids” than “real” Old Tom gins.
The real issue is, that basically all Old Tom Gins today are based on neutral alcohol. Gin producers are trying to emulate the botanical recipes of the respective gin - but everybody seem to forget, that the more original style has been based on malt wines.

It is unlikely to see anytime soon a gin producer making an authentic "Old Style Old Tom Gin" - but it would be interesting to see, if a whisky producer (like Glenmorangie" would take it on and would produce a gin.

I also don't want here to insist on perfect authenticity. Probably nobody would really like to drink the original OTG's today. They would be harsh. However a refined version (made with good quality double distilled new make whisky), would be true to its origins and would be a very interesting proposal for me.


Popular posts from this blog

How to use citric acid - and why you might not want to use it anyway!

To be honest, I shied away of this topic, because I think, people can misinterpret this - big time. I don't want to be part of the problem - I want to be part of the solution!  But when Chris, over at A Bar Above  discussed this subject- I literally could not resist to join into "the discussion". Here is the video: I - however take a bit slower approach than Chris. What is citric acid? Chemical Compound Citric acid is a weak organic acid with the formula C6H8O7. It is a natural preservative/conservative and is also used to add an acidic or sour taste to foods and drinks. Wikipedia Formula: C6H8O7 Molar Mass: 192.124 g/mol Melting Point: 153C Density: 1.66 g/cm3 Boiling point: 175C Soluble in: Water Why is it controversial? In my "mixology world" it is controversial, as citric acid is the stuff, which makes the nightmarish sour mix [ preferably in powder form ] sour. Yeah - citric acid is the main ingredient in one of the most

Agar-Agar Clarification

Not often, I am posting here things, which are clearly not my ideas... However Dave Arnold is clearly a mad scientist [no, he really is!] - and he posted amazing stuff on his website - no - don't click now - just follow the link later. One of the most impressive posts about mixology, besides of demystifying the mechanics of shaking, were clarification techniques. Look, after him, you could use a centrifuge [which would set you back a couple thousand bucks] and a chemical compound, which solidifies sediments. I am not a fan of that. Then there is gelatine clarification; this works quite well [I tried it several times my self] - you gelatinize a liquid [with little gelatine only], freeze it, thaw it [in the fridge] over a colander and a muslin cloth. Thats it. Unfortunately this has several problems: Gelatine is made out of animal bones - hence it is neither vegetarian nor vegan, which you won't usually expect of a beverage. You have to freez

King Robert II Vodka

Who would knew, that I am reviewing a budget vodka here - on the But this isn't a normal review. I skip the marketing perception and use this product to cut directly to the case: Vodka is a "rather" neutral, colorless, "rather" flavorless and odorless distilled beverage from any agricultural source - and depending on the country, it has a minimum of 37.5% and 40% abv. As I said time and time again before: at times it is absolutely nonsense to talk about premium and luxury, when the original product doesn't really "hold this promise". Luxury water can have luxurious marketing, luxurious packaging, can be even rare and slightly more expensive "to produce". However really it is just water. Maybe it has some nuances to normal water - however those nuances (in a blind-test) are pretty small. Vodka is extremely similar - and the chain of evidence (despite a lot of people trying to proof otherwise) makes it re