Skip to main content

Whisky (or other distillate) Snobbery?


Sorren Krebs over at OCDwhisky.com has written this post, which criticizes the whisky snobbery of many distilleries. And I can understand this cri de coeur without completely supporting it.


Look - I do find value for money brands great. I find it alluring, that some brands care about the fact, that their products to be consumed, instead of being traded - or being showpieces in rich men liquor cabinets. However - we are living in a capitalistic world, where the market just determines decisions of brands and companies.

But is it sustainable to hype your product and "premiumize" it?

There are many factors which determine, if a business survives on the long run. At this point (if in question) I would rather put my money onto The Macallan than on Glen Moray, when it comes to survival. 
It is important, that we look at it not solely from the perspective of a seasoned and knowledgeable consumer (on-trade / off-trade) - it is important that we are looking at it from a business standpoint and an average consumer standpoint (market segment).

While a lot of "us" are complaining, that e.g. The Macallan is unrealistically expensive (and that the original style fades), most of us will rush to any event of the brand - and if we have got the cash, we are buying their products. This is madness.

Hence I can absolutely understand The Macallan why they are doing, what they are doing: it is a business and they are selling. Most wealthy customers are more brand focused than knowledgeable and it is a who's who game.

Good marketing is changing our behavior is deceiving us to buy products, which we are not necessarily need. We can also benefit of it - when we are using it for our advantage. 

Let's not hack on one brand (which has excellent marketing) - let's compare Heaven Hill and Jack Daniel's.

I can say for sure, that both brands are competent whiskey makers. Whoever knows me, can tell to which brand I am more gravitated towards... However this doesn't mean, that I don't have respect of the men of Jack Daniel's (ups - it is out).

In fact, JD showed a lot of promise in the last couple of years, when they introduced Rye - and lately even some experimental series. 
But let's also see, that Heaven Hill is the company, which "insiders" love to see as "role model". They are prioritizing their product first, second and third - even though they increased their prices, their products are still a great deal less expensive than the products of their competition. However I believe firmly, that for most people (other than insiders, experts and some connoisseurs), Heaven Hill isn't a name, which convinces with quality (even though their awards are multitude). Which casual whiskey drinker knows Elijah Craig, Evan Williams, Parker's Heritage or Rittenhouse?
Compared to this, who knows Jack Daniel's? Everyone. In a bar or club, people would buy shots (or a bottle) of JD. Even though you get a far more mediocre product and you possibly pay far more. 
Jack Daniel's are heavily investing into Marketing and Heaven Hill is mostly investing into their quality and value for money. 
While I am sure, that HH will just do fine in the future (their rye is legendary - and they don't even have sufficient quality for the global demand) - you know that Jack Daniel's is doing far better - even with their premium offerings Gentlemen Jack and Single Barrel and "God forbid" - Frank Sinatra Reserve . 

So... instead of complaining about the status quo, I would rather shout out to insiders, craft-bartenders and connoisseurs to talk more about the Heaven Hill's or the Glen Moray's - which offer amazing value - spread the gospel instead of complaining about unaffordable products - and vote with your wallet!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to use citric acid - and why you might not want to use it anyway!

To be honest, I shied away of this topic, because I think, people can misinterpret this - big time.


I don't want to be part of the problem - I want to be part of the solution! But when Chris, over at A Bar Above discussed this subject- I literally could not resist to join into "the discussion".

Here is the video:





I - however take a bit slower approach than Chris.
What is citric acid?
Chemical Compound
Citric acid is a weak organic acid with the formula C6H8O7. It is a natural preservative/conservative and is also used to add an acidic or sour taste to foods and drinks.
Wikipedia Formula: C6H8O7
Molar Mass: 192.124 g/mol
Melting Point: 153C
Density: 1.66 g/cm3
Boiling point: 175C
Soluble in: Water
Why is it controversial?
In my "mixology world" it is controversial, as citric acid is the stuff, which makes the nightmarish sour mix [preferably in powder form] sour. Yeah - citric acid is the main ingredient in one of the most controversial [and in the modern craft bartending wor…

The Best Alcohol-free Drink - Ipanema

Usually I call them [out of laziness] mocktails - but really I never liked this denomination.
As "mocktails" are usually long drinks, it is even twice wrong, to connect them to a cocktail [which is technically a short drink with alcohol]. 
Apart of this, I am not a big believer in mocktails. Sodas can be fantastic [home made grapefruit soda is fantastic, or homemade ginger ale, ginger beer or any other odd ingredient sodas]. Juices - fine. Lemonades - yes, refreshing and good. And iced teas - can be absolutely amazing. Hence you don't need sickly sweet syrupy juice mixtures.
But yes - there are few good ones.
Most of them a mimicking drinks with alcohol. You can make a pretty good alcohol-free Planters Punch, Hurricane or Mojito, if you are using Caribbean Syrup. Or you can use a juniper syrup for some alcohol-free gin drinks.
A drink which I got to know long time ago, very early in my career, is a bit a different beast [well - you cannot call an alcohol-free drink a bea…

Top 10 Mojito sins

I am often really annoyed when I see people, making cocktails (blogging about cocktails, etc.).

Look, I love cocktail culture - I believe, that it is worth to be preserved. And I believe, that there has to be respect - because otherwise there won’t be anything to be preserved.

The Mojito is one drink, which gets molested all the time. And people don’t get it: there are drinks, which were consumed in a civilized environment (bars) - by more or less civilized people (at least they are civilized in the setting). And there are peasant drinks. A peasant drink can be great - I don’t judge, which drink is better - but latter is far more adaptable to changes.
Comparing the Mojito versus the Caipirinha is pretty obvious: the Mojito is a bar drink. Very soon after its creation, it has been consumed in Cuba’s most recognized bars - probably by the most famous people at its time.
Against that, the Caipirinha has been a drink of farmers and workers in Brazil.

The difference is a pretty big deal - …